Politics Research, Comparative area Studies, and area Studies: contextual, substantive, and Methodological Considerations
Keywords:
Comparative Politics , Comparative Method , Comparative Area Studies Plan for ResearchAbstract
This article thoroughly analyzes the continuing discussion regarding comparative area studies, which is a branch of area studies that is not well recognized or valued. While the research generally centers around political science, it is important to highlight that many of its themes have relevance and applicability to other academic areas. Ensuring that the scholarly discussions and advancements in the field of area studies after the end of the Cold War are given proper attention. Following our presentation of a distinct concept of comparative area studies, we proceed to examine several current viewpoints regarding the topic. An important section emphasizes the significance of conducting research that includes both comparative and individual locations. This study will thoroughly analyze two methodological difficulties that commonly emerge in the field of comparative area studies: the selection of research methodology and the application of concepts. The inquiry concludes with a succinct summary of the major arguments put forth.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles published in the Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review (SSHRR) remain the copyright of their respective authors. SSHRR publishes content under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows readers to freely share, copy, adapt, and build upon the work in any medium or format, provided proper credit is given to both the authors and the journal.
Third‑party materials included in the articles are subject to their own copyright and must be properly attributed. The journal reserves the right to host, distribute, and preserve all published content to ensure long‑term access and integrity.
