Digital Trade and Cyber-Facilitated Human Trafficking: Legal Challenges and Regulatory Gaps in Pakistan

Authors

  • Khizar Hayat LLB, Gillani Law College, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan
  • Jahanzaib Noor Muhammad LLM, Gillani Law College, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan
  • Muhammad Zakria LLB, Gillani Law College, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan
  • Zopash Khan BS Criminology, Department of Sociology & Criminology, Kohat University of Science and Technology
  • Noman Nadeem BS Criminology, Department of Criminology, NFC IET Multan
  • Dr. Ahmad Saad Assistant Professor, School of Law, Multan University of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63468/sshrr.371

Keywords:

Cyber-Trafficking Nexus, PECA 2016, human trafficking, digital trade, social anti-trafficking law, cyber slavery

Abstract

The merging of digital trade platforms and organised crime networks has created a new and relatively unregulated aspect of human trafficking, which is ever more committed by means of cyber-enabled platforms such as social media, online job portals, encrypted messaging apps, and cryptocurrency-based payment networks. The paper examines the issues of legal and regulatory voids that Pakistan faces in combating cyber-enabled human trafficking, a phenomenon that is theorised in the paper as the Cyber-Trafficking Nexus a systemic interaction of digital commerce ecosystems and contemporary slavery networks. Based on the methodology of a critical assessment of the sufficiency of the main legal tools, the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016 (PECA) and the Prevention of Trafficking in Persons Act 2018 (PTPA) along with provincial anti-trafficking laws, the study compares the effectiveness of these instruments in dealing with technologically mediated trafficking offences in Pakistan. The discussion shows that PECA 2016 is inadequately structured: it was not created with typologies of trafficking in mind, does not have a means of proactively surveilling trafficking networks digitally, and does not deal with cryptocurrency-mediated money flows; the PTPA 2018, in turn, precedes the widespread popularization of social-media recruitment and lacks any cyber-specific definition. According to the statistical data presented by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and foreign monitoring groups, there is systematic under-prosecution, insufficient victim identification and a lack of cross-sector digital collaboration. By comparing the Digital Services Act by the European Union, the Modern Slavery Act 2015 of the United Kingdom, and the relevant United Nations frameworks such as the Palermo Protocol and the UNODC Model Law, this article suggests a tripartite Legal Reform Model to be adopted in Pakistan that includes the legislation integration, the regulation technology requirements, and the international forms of digital collaboration. This paper concludes that Pakistan legislative architecture, unless it is added to by a specific Cyber-Trafficking Act, will be structurally unable to face this twenty-first century incarnation of human exploitation.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Khizar Hayat`, Jahanzaib Noor Muhammad, Muhammad Zakria, Zopash Khan, Noman Nadeem, & Dr. Ahmad Saad. (2026). Digital Trade and Cyber-Facilitated Human Trafficking: Legal Challenges and Regulatory Gaps in Pakistan. Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review, 4(2), 2872-2883. https://doi.org/10.63468/sshrr.371

Similar Articles

1-10 of 255

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.